Of course we want them to feed in the crop or pasture area when pests are there- but pests are not there all the time luckily for us!
So semi natural areas are essential to provide the invertebrate and plant resources for all year round food. Carabids lay their eggs in the soil, hatching into larvae- which take around 6 months to grow, before they pupate and emerge into adult beetles. The larvae are actually predatory on crop pests too, and eat more than adults as they need a lot of protein to grow. Some larvae also eat weed seeds, which is particularly useful as they live in the top soil levels in the crop area.
To help larvae grow undisturbed in crop areas, minimum tillage systems may be useful. Carabids have two main periods when they need shelter: hibernation, and aestivation, which is a summer rest period when conditions are too hot and arid. At these times, the beetles take advantage of permanent habit with structure that creates a protective microclimate- such as hedges, ditches, banks, and at a small scale the tussocks created by some grasses.
Another important aspect is the shelter from machinery and chemical applications. These can cause direct mortality, or affect the carabids ability to feed and breed, so safe areas near to crops allow some beetles to thrive and repopulate when such management is necessary.
To preserve or enhance the diversity of carabids on your farm it is important to have a range of habitats, but also for them to be linked up. Firstly populations need those seasonal and foraging movements, but as conditions change, different species can immigrate into your farm from surrounding areas to boost your assemblage of species. Farm habitats for beetles: a grass and flower margins, along with hedges provide food resources year round, and connect other habitats; b beetle banks create stable resources in the centre of fields, to encourage beetle presence in crop areas; c taking corners out of management encourages scrub and tussocky grasses- ideal for sheltering carabids.
My recent work has shown that different species are associated with different landscape features such as field boundary habitats, crops, soils, and management such as tillage regimes. If we can better understand which habitats are most beneficial for different beetles, it will become possible to tailor your farm habitats to get a good selection of predatory species that suit a farms particular pests.
Pitfall trapping is a quick and easy way to see what carabids you have on your farm, and if you do pitfall trapping periodically, you can track how the populations vary over time relative to your farm management interventions.
For details see my factsheet:. How to pitfall trap on your farm: Factsheet. Attractiveness of common insectary and harvestable floral resources to beneficial insects. Biological Control, 56 1 , Distribution of arthropod species across the margins of farm woodlands. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment, 48 3 , Bulletin of Entomological Research, 94 3 , Carabid diets and food value. The analysis of the content of the digestive tract of carabids allows the evaluation of the types of food eaten in the field.
Comparison of iso-enzime electrophoresis and gut content examination for determining the natural diet of the ground beetle species Abax ater Coleoptera: Carabidae.
Entomologia Generalis, 19 4 , Advances in molecular ecology: tracking trophic links through predator-prey food webs. Functional Ecology, 19 5 , Feeding mode and prey detectability half-lives in molecular gut-content analysis: an example with two predators of the Colorado potato beetle.
Bulletin Entomological Research, 97 2 , Diverse diet compositions among harpaline ground beetle species revealed by mixing model analyses of stable isotope ratios.
Ecological Entomology, 35 3 , Which prey sustains cold-adapted invertebrate generalist predators in arable land? Examining prey choices by molecular gut-content analysis. Journal Applied Ecology, 48 3 , The study of the feeding habits of these beetles through dissection and analysis by optical microscopy is an important way to clarify the environmental aspects related to carabids, given the variety of foods that can be eaten by insects.
This information may facilitate the advancement of techniques to rear these insects in the laboratory for use in biological control programmes against agricultural pests.
In this work, we determine the types of food content in the digestive tract of nine species of Carabidae associated with herbaceous plants and different growth stages of coloured cotton.
The coloured cotton cv. Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental area with colored cotton cv. BRS verde Gossypium hirsutum subdivided into 48 traps associated with the borders of herbaceous flowering plants PHF and weeds. Brassicaceae , marigold Tagetes erecta L.
Asteraceae , and buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum Moench Polygonaceae. One of the edges was formed by weed plants: Amaranthus retroflexus L. Amaranthaceae ; Sida spinosa L. Malvaceae ; Digitaria insularis L. Gaer and Cenchrus echinatus L. Poaceae ; Acanthospermum hispidum DC. Asteraceae ; Portulaca oleracea L. Small Euphorbiaceae ; Commelina benghalensis L. Commelinaceae ; Indigofera hirsuta L. The FHP species were planted using seedlings or seeds, and they were allowed to grow for a period of time to match the phase of flowering of these plants with the beginning of sampling of carabids on cotton.
In the coloured cotton area, 12 pitfall traps associated with each edge were installed, and the traps were spaced 4 m apart and 1 m from the edges of the FHPs and weeds Figure 1. The traps were made with 8 cm plastic cups containing a water solution The species captured were separated and kept frozen for later dissection. The species were identified by Dr. George E. For this study, individuals of each beetle species in each of the phenological periods were dissected under a stereoscopic microscope Table 1.
Using fine-point scissors, the dorsal region tergum and the ventral region sternum were separated. The digestive tract was then removed and placed in a Petri dish, sectioning the crop region and the proventriculus with a scalpel. The material was analysed in a saline solution 0. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1 , The classification of food content followed Holopainen and Helenius Holopainen, J.
Gut contents of ground beetles Col. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, 42 1 , Barbosa et al. However, when associated with Tagetes erecta and weed plants, T. A lower number of prey items was observed during the vegetative stage compared to the reproductive and harvest stages. According to Marur and Ruano Marur, C. Informe da Pesquisa, 1 , In this study, it was observed that in the vegetative stage, Scarites sp. The food type F fluid was observed only when C.
Moreover, C. Tetracha brasiliensis showed this content in association with F. Only T. When associated with all FHPs, Galerita brasiliensis showed a higher frequency of individuals with arthropod identifiable parts AIP , such as lepidopteran heads, legs and spiracles. This was not observed in the other studied species Figure 2. This finding is indicative of the high level of predation shown by this carabid beetle when associated with flowering plants.
In terms of Calosoma granulatum and Selenophorus alternans , AIP content was found only when these species were associated with L. In the predator C. These results are in accordance with those of Gidaspow Gidaspow, T. Bulletin of the American Museum Natural History, 7 , The presence of Collembola was observed in Selenophorus alternans Figure 2.
Similar results were reported by Penny Penny, M. Studies on certain aspects of the ecology of Nebria brevicollis F. Journal of Animal Ecology, 35 1 , Hengeveld Hengeveld, R. Polyphagy, oligophagy and food specialization in ground beetles Coleoptera, Carabidae. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 30 4 , When associated with FHPs, S. Sunderland Sunderland, K. The diet of some predatory arthopods in cereal crops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 12 2 , In the study by Barbosa et al.
The presence of amorphous masses AMs was common in A. In contrast, G. Forsythe Forsythe, T. Feeding mechanisms of certain ground beetles Coleoptera: Carabidae. Coleopterist Bulletin, 36 1 , Fabreries, Suppl — Google Scholar. Losey JE, Denno RF Positive predator-predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology — Google Scholar.
Luff ML Carabidae. Stork NE ed The role of ground beetles in ecological and environmental studies. Suenega H, Hamamura T Laboratory evaluation of carabid beetles Coleoptera: Carabidae as predators of diamondback moth Lepidoptera: Plutellidae larvae.
Environ Entomol — Google Scholar. Thiele HU Carabid beetles in their environments: a study on habitat selection by adaptations in physiology and behaviour.
Eric W. Riddick 1 1.
0コメント